Building the Future: How to Move Your Family, Overcome Fear, and Create the Next Chapter Together
A Tactical and Emotional Guide to Leaving Safely, Planning Wisely, and Living Freely — Before the World Forces Your Hand.
So, there we were—our family, kids, adults, all of us—sitting around the dining room table after dinner. The question was put before everyone:
Where are we going to immigrate to?
Canada?
Ireland?
Italy?
Spain?
Portugal?
Malta?
Or… Country X?
I gave a full briefing on each:
What would it take to move there?
How residency and citizenship pathways worked.
Political and economic climates.
Cultural realities.
A CIA-level debrief, complete with charts, statistics, pros, and cons.
The kids didn’t like Italy, Spain, Portugal, Malta, or Canada.
They worried they wouldn’t have strong career opportunities.
They didn’t think they could learn Italian, Spanish, or Portuguese fast enough to compete.
They thought Malta’s economy was too small.
They said Canada was “too cold”—a claim I challenged, considering we live in Minnesota (Toronto and Ottawa are the same climate, and we somehow survive here).
They were honest. Emotional. And, because they inherited my Italian genes, very animated.
My wife leaned toward Canada. It would be the least disruptive. And frankly, she’s right. Minnesota, Toronto, Ottawa—culturally and economically, there’s far less adjustment than if we moved to Europe.
Plus: the dogs.
We have two big golden retrievers. Driving them across the border sounds a lot less traumatic than forcing them through a 12-hour transatlantic flight. (It sounds trivial, but when you're moving your entire life, nothing is trivial.)
The girls kept fixating on how they were going to "freeze to death" in Canada. (A bit dramatic, maybe. But emotional objections always sound more like life-and-death than they rationally are.)
So it came back to me.
I said: Ireland is the better bet for long-term safety and strategic distance from the U.S.—because if things truly go sideways, Canada is still geographically and economically dependent on the U.S. in a way that Europe is not.
But we needed more than one plan.
Thus, after several hours of sometimes loud but honest discussion, the shortlist emerged: Ireland. Canada. Portugal.
Now, I could have just played King of Siam: "We are moving to Ireland. So let it be written, so let it be done."
(Not keen on shaving my head.)
I’m the one driving this entire operation.
I’ll fund it.
I’ll set up the companies or secure the citizenships.
I’ll pay the lawyers, the accountants, the governments.
I’ll pay to put the kids and my wife into legal status abroad, whether by bloodline citizenship (Italy), or business residency (Ireland).
If I wanted to dictate it, I probably could have.
I didn’t.
I’m not a psychologist. So I’m not going to Fraiser Crane the shit out of this.
But I have negotiated with foreign governments for the United States.
I’ve negotiated multi-million dollar commercial deals for companies.
It’s the same core dynamic every time: You don’t force buy-in. You earn it.
There’s a great book by Chris Voss, Never Split the Difference. I’ve met Chris a few times. One thing he said stuck with me:
“In the FBI, we couldn’t say, ‘You kill a few hostages, we take a few hostages, and that's a good deal.’ Negotiation isn’t about compromise. It’s about emotional needs.”
Exactly.
The real negotiation isn’t which country to move to. It’s how you make people feel safe enough to say yes.
And that’s what this guide is really about. There are two elements here. The first is dealing with people’s fears. The second deals with the plan so everyone feels comfortable enough to buy in on the execution.
The Five Emotional Dynamics You Have to Navigate to Get Family Buy-In
Immigration isn't a rational decision, even when the facts demand it. It’s emotional. And emotions follow patterns.
There are five dominant emotional dynamics you’ll have to recognize, manage, and move through if you want real buy-in:
1. Fear: "What if we make it worse?"
Fear isn’t about where you're going. Fear is about loss. It’s not about gain. It’s never about gain. It’s about what you leave behind — security, identity, familiarity.
What it sounds like:
"What if we can’t find jobs?"
"What if we lose our healthcare?"
“What if we lose our money?”
“What if we can’t find jobs?”
“What if I can’t go to school?”
"What if we can't make friends?"
How to navigate it:
Normalize fear as expected, not as evidence you’re making a mistake.
Fear is a natural reaction to uncertainty, not a signal you’re choosing wrong.Offer small, tangible reassurances:
Show how many expats already live there.
Walk through realistic job markets.
Share transition timelines.
Avoid "everything will be fine" platitudes. People don’t need cheerleading.
They need clarity and plans.The more agency you provide — information, real choices, small actions — the less fear will control them.
The more visibility you offer — clearly labeling specific fears — the more those fears can be attacked one by one. When you don’t provide visibility, people catastrophize. Panic fills the vacuum.
Clarity kills panic.Fear can also corrode dignity. Especially for Americans raised to believe "America is number one," the idea of leaving — of becoming "outsiders" — feels like an identity loss. This triggers deeper psychological reactions: shame, anger, and withdrawal.
One of the most overlooked fears in emigration is fear of isolation — fear that you’ll have no tribe, anchor, or belonging. This fear feeds directly into grief, ego, and loyalty resistance. Identity loss creates real trauma. The antidote isn't denial. It’s acknowledgment — and a clear commitment to rebuilding community wherever you land. You’re not just moving. You’re choosing to survive and thrive — not by hoping things stay the same, but by having the courage to build something better.
2. Grief: "I don’t want to lose my home."
Leaving your country — even one in decline — is a form of mourning. They’re grieving the death of the life they thought they would have.
What it sounds like:
"We built our whole life here."
"I don't want to be a foreigner."
"What about the house? The holidays? Our friends?"
How to navigate it:
Let them grieve. Don't rush it.
Acknowledge the loss before pitching the new life.
Honor what they're giving up. ("I get it. You built something beautiful here. It’s okay to miss it, even as we build something new.")
3. Ego: "I don’t want to feel like a refugee."
Emigration feels, to many, like admitting failure — even when it's rationally the smartest move.
The fear isn’t just about geography.
It’s about losing pride. Dignity. Identity.
What it sounds like:
"We should stay and fix things."
"Running away isn't right."
"Maybe things aren’t that bad."
"We’re throwing away everything we’ve built."
How to navigate it:
You are not negotiating with logic.
You’re negotiating with survival instinct.
Ego-driven fear comes from the reptilian brain — the fight, flight, freeze part of us that doesn’t listen to data. It hijacks the neocortex and floods it with emotion. If you try to argue with it, you lose.
You cannot push someone out of fear.
You have to lead them out of it.
First, you label the fear: "It sounds like you're feeling like we'd be giving up everything we've fought for."
Then, you reframe with a calibrated question: "How would it feel if leaving wasn’t giving up — but protecting what we built, so it doesn't get destroyed?"
Next, anchor their pride: "You’ve built something strong enough that it’s worth carrying forward. How do we make sure it survives?"
Finally, you restore agency through small decisions: "What part of our life here do you most want to rebuild wherever we go?"
You are not trying to win an argument.
You are trying to save the mission.
Because if you fail to move them out of ego-driven fear, they will sabotage the entire plan. Consciously or unconsciously, they will find a way to destroy the move rather than face the shame of it.
Leaving isn’t surrender.
It’s survival with honor.
But they’ll only believe that if you meet them where they are — and walk them out, step by step.
4. Loyalty: "Am I betraying my country, my parents, my past?"
For many, the emotional tether to their country — even a collapsing one — is real and binding.
I really understand this one. I took an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States.
What it sounds like:
"My parents are buried here."
"We owe it to stay and fight."
"We’ll be abandoning our people."
How to navigate it:
Validate loyalty as a virtue — and then expand its meaning.
Loyalty doesn’t mean self-destruction. Loyalty means preserving our family’s future, even if it means hard choices.
It is not a value unless it costs you something, and in this case, the values you’re preserving are your freedom, that of your children’s future, and the values that are unlikely to be preserved in the United States. Our ancestors crossed the seas looking for a better future; we must do the same now.
Honor the past without sacrificing the future.
Again, tactical empathy is the key:
Label the feeling: "It sounds like you’re torn — like staying feels like honoring where you come from."
Mirror their deeper value: "What would it look like to honor what they built... while making sure it doesn’t die with us?"
Calibrated question to reframe loyalty: "How do we stay loyal to the values they passed down — freedom, safety, a future — if staying here means watching them be destroyed?"
Create identity preservation: "What if leaving isn’t abandoning them — but fulfilling the promise they hoped for when they came here?"
Offer agency and dignity: "If you could build a life where their sacrifices weren’t wasted, but carried forward — what would that look like?"
It is funny, but I’m the one who took the oath, but I’m also the one who had to convince three other people in my house that it was time to go. This is how I did it. By convincing the three other people that the only way to preserve the values we all believed were essential was to ensure they survived by our surviving and thriving somewhere else.
That’s the reality of it.
5. Hope: "Could it be better?"
Hope isn’t automatic. It's fragile. People who have been crushed by events need permission to believe again.
What it sounds like:
"Maybe it’s not too late here."
"How do we know it’ll be better somewhere else?"
How to navigate it:
Paint a concrete, achievable vision of life post-move.
Focus on first wins ("first apartment," "first local friendships," "first family holiday abroad") — not big, overwhelming promises about "reinventing life."
Importantly: Let them imagine themselves succeeding, not just surviving.
You're Not Selling a Move. You're Selling a Future.
You can't sell someone on a plane ticket.
You have to sell them on the idea that:
They have a future
That future is worth the pain of change
And you’re all going there together
If you understand the emotional landscape, you stop arguing about countries and start building consensus around what really matters: A future you want to live in, together.
You Need More Than One Plan
Getting buy-in is not the end of the negotiation. It's the beginning of the commitment.
Let’s be as frank as possible: you’re betting on this. I’ve spent a good chunk of my life on things where life and death mattered. I’ve trained on the use of deadly force. I’ve been an advisor on geopolitical risk for a decade. I’ve advised on policies that, yes, probably resulted in people losing their lives. When the stakes are at that level, when you can’t hit “reset” or “do-over,” you learn a key thing: preserve flexibility, have more than one idea.
Your family and your lives are riding on “this decision.” Once your family is emotionally on board, you can't tie their future to a single dice roll. You roll craps, you’re done.
Hope isn't a strategy.
You need multiple ways to win — and they need to see them clearly.
Why you need redundancy:
Political risk: Laws change. Governments shift. What’s legal today may be closed tomorrow. U.S. Political stability, something that was previously unthinkable as a variable, is now something that must be considered in your planning.
Logistical risk: Visa processing delays, paperwork issues, and unforeseen denials can derail the best-laid plans.
Personal risk: Family members’ needs evolve. Someone may refuse to move when it’s time, or someone may need to stay behind temporarily. Health issues could come up.
Economic risk: Exchange rates, job markets, real estate opportunities — they fluctuate.
One plan is a hope.
Two plans are a strategy.
Three plans are resilience.
Now, getting the whole family involved in all of this is key. The more they’re involved, the more everyone calms down and feels they have agency, the more they’re invested in it.
Plus, as you’re about to see, there’s a lot to be planned out. This isn’t going on vacation; this is a serious operational planning strategy. You’re mapping out a major life decision that makes a wedding look like a minor skirmish.
Tactical Execution: Building Redundant Paths
Now that you understand you need more than one plan, you need to understand something even more important:
No plan survives first contact with reality.
You can run the spreadsheets, read the laws, and plot the timelines. But when you hit execution — when you file the visa, sell the house, book the flight — chaos enters the system.
And that’s not failure.
That’s normal.
What matters isn’t rigid perfection. What matters is structured flexibility — enough preparation that you can adapt without panicking.
Right now, you need to sort out three types of plans:
Primary Plan: Your First and Best Option
This is your preferred destination — the country you are building toward today.
You take action here first:
Secure vital documents (passports, birth certificates, marriage licenses, educational records).
Research residency or citizenship pathways.
Build initial financial infrastructure (bank accounts, international transfer capacity).
Identify housing options and cost-of-living basics.
The mindset here: Act as if this is happening.
Because it is — unless something blocks it.
Secondary Plan: Your Backup If Primary Fails
This is the alternate path you prepare quietly, in parallel.
Maybe your primary was Ireland, but you keep a file open on Canada, Portugal, or another viable option.
For Secondary, you want 80% readiness:
Pre-researched visa options.
Financial documents and proofs that could be rapidly refiled.
Basic understanding of relocation requirements.
The mindset here: "If the door closes, we don’t stand around shocked. We pivot."
Emergency Plan: Your Immediate Bolt Hole
Most people ignore this. It’s why they fail.
If collapse moves faster than paperwork, you need a plan for a fast, dirty, imperfect exit.
Identify a country with minimal entry requirements (e.g., visa-free access, visa-on-arrival).
Have basic liquidity ready (accessible cash, wireable funds, mobile banking).
Know where you can live short-term cheaply and safely (Airbnb, extended-stay hotels, short-term rentals).
Prepare a "go packet" — passports, key documents, essentials — physically ready to grab.
The mindset here: "If the roof catches fire, we don’t argue about paint colors. We move."
Why All Three Matter
You need all three plans ready because:
Primary keeps you on offense.
Secondary keeps you resilient.
Emergency keeps you alive.
If you only plan Primary, you gamble everything on an orderly world.
If you also build Secondary and Emergency, you stack the odds back in your favor — no matter how messy it gets.
One plan is hope.
Three plans are a strategy.
Redundancy is freedom.
Advanced techniques: A/B within destinations
Having a primary, secondary, and emergency plan is good.
But truly resilient movers think even deeper:
They build multiple paths within their primary destination.
Not just where you go — but how you get there.
Example: Ireland
Take my case. Ireland is my primary target.
My first entry vector is through citizenship by descent. I’m pursuing Italian citizenship via my ancestry. If successful, that Italian passport gives me EU citizenship — which grants me immediate rights to live, work, and reside in Ireland through the Common Travel Area agreements.
Simple. Direct. Elegant.
If that works, after five years of residence in Ireland, I could even petition for Irish naturalization — building a second passport and greater flexibility for the future.
But what if that path collapses?
What if Italy tightens its citizenship laws further?
What if Irish immigration rules change post-EU pressures?
What if bureaucratic timelines stretch beyond what I can risk?
Should I abandon Ireland immediately and switch to Canada?
No. I run a second vector inside Ireland.
Because I own businesses, I could move my companies, financial assets, and operational base to Ireland. Ireland actively welcomes business migration. If structured properly, I could qualify under their Start-up Entrepreneur Programme or through other business-based residency channels.
Moving my businesses becomes both:
An immediate evacuation option if needed
A secondary strategic entry if the first plan slows down
In effect:
Ireland Plan A: Bloodline Citizenship
Ireland Plan B: Business-Based Residency
Why A/B Planning Matters
Most countries have more than one doorway:
Citizenship by descent
Investment migration
Business formation
Work permits
Study pathways
Marriage/family sponsorships
If you only think about one, you’re fragile.
If you think about two or three, you’re durable.
Flexibility isn’t an accident.
It’s engineered.
When you study multiple entry vectors, you create layers of fallback — without having to abandon your geographic preference immediately.
How to Start A/B Planning
List all entry paths for your chosen destination: bloodline, business, student, skilled worker, entrepreneur, etc.
Assess feasibility: What documents, finances, or timelines would each require?
Build slow/fast pairs:
One slow, strategic path (e.g., citizenship)
One fast, tactical path (e.g., business relocation, remote work visa)
Maintain optionality: Don't commit everything to one paperwork process until you're physically secure abroad.
Build not just exits — but options inside your exits.
You’re not running, you’re building
This journey — the one you're about to make — isn’t just about survival.
It’s about the future.
I’ve come to realize that fact. It’s painful in some ways. I’ve come to realize that my grandchildren probably, possibly, won’t be Americans. That I’m likely to die in a foreign land. My daughters will spend their lives growing up somewhere else, marrying somewhere else, and our family will grow and become something in another part of the world.
That is simultaneously an exciting and terrifying notion.
This journey is about understanding fear, not surrendering to it.
It’s about acknowledging grief without letting it paralyze you.
It’s about preserving loyalty, not as a chain to the past, but as a bridge to something better.
It’s about realizing you don’t have to choose between staying together and moving forward.
You can do both.
The real goal isn’t just to escape something broken.
It’s to build something better — by design, not by accident.
To create a life where other people's failures don't trap your family, but are freed by your courage to act.
That’s what all of this planning, this redundancy, this flexibility is for.
Not because you fear collapse, but because you have the strength to design your own future even in uncertain times.
The world may shift under your feet.
Countries may close.
Economies may stumble.
Old assurances may break.
But if you move with clarity, with structure, with emotional truth —
if you build primary, secondary, and emergency paths —
if you preserve agency at every step —
you will not just survive.
You will choose.
You will lead.
You will create the next chapter of your life and your family's life with your own hands.
One plan is hope.
Three plans are sovereignty.
Multiple vectors are freedom.
And freedom — real freedom — isn't given.
It’s built.
It’s defended.
It’s chosen.
And that is precisely what you are doing — together.
As for us… I have a sneaking suspicion we’ll either be cheering the Leafs and freezing our asses off, or drinking Guiness and cursing the Irish tanning weather.
Either way…we’ll be doing it together.
That’s what matters, at least from my perspective.
La famiglia è uno dei capolavori della nature.
If this helped you? Subscribe.
Borderless Living is the field manual for building sovereign family strategies in an uncertain world.
You’ll get deep tactical briefs on relocation, citizenship, risk modeling, and emotional navigation—just like this.
Subscribe for free. Read more.
Decide if you want to build something bigger.
👉 Subscribe to Borderless Living
(If you're already serious and ready to build your family's plan with strategic support, check out the Sovereign Architect tier. It's capped at 20. It's $2K/year. And it's where we do this work together.)
We keep coming back to the idea that nobody -- then or now -- denigrates the folks who were able to escape Europe in the late 1930s as having abandoned their nations, or as somehow having failed.
What they were were the lucky ones who had the sense and the means to see what was coming, and get out ahead of it. You cannot fault them for their wisdom or their foresight. There is no shame in following their example, because they're the ones whose lives and legacies survived.
I do feel a bit like I bailed. I'm a Mayflower descendant, a six-times-over DAR candidate, the great-great-granddaughter of a Union general. For all those generations, my ancestors stuck by America through whatever came, and fought whatever battles needed fighting. I absolutely feel like I'm failing to uphold an essential family tradition.
But my husband's great-grandparents left Kiev and Odessa on the eve of WWI. And they never looked back. They arrived in the US in 1913 with nothing. 20 years later, they owned a chain of grocery stores that spanned Los Angeles. So I'm taking my cues from him -- and them.
In turbulent eras like this one, there's more than one way to win. Like my husband's ancestors, we're choosing the one that will keep our family and our fortune more or less intact and moving forward into a better future. As legacies go, I'll take it.
There's a tremendous amount of privilege that you, and others who can use this template, have to be able to utilize this. I'm glad for those who have such a wide range of options to be able to have multiple pathways. I appreciate your articulating how to make a plan along with fallbacks. I just needed to state a few things that people may not even think about due to their level of privilege.
Visa options are limited for those who are retired unless you have a lot of financial wealth; there are some countries that welcome retirees, but in a warming world, the choices narrow quickly. For those whose ancestors are from the global majority, getting a visa by descent rules out EU countries and many countries that have some kind of democratic government. For those who are disabled or have chronic health issues, the options for countries that are accessible or accessible-friendly become even smaller. The options for redundancy or fallback are few to none. The systemic injustices are made starkly visible, just like looking at a budget to see what is truly important by what is funded, it becomes clear who is valued by who is encouraged to live there vs who is not. I'm still exploring, and would certainly appreciate suggestions... and I am acutely aware that there will be many who will not even have choices.